In this guide · 8 sections
- 01Small, mid-range or frontier: what a support chatbot needs
- 02Price per 1,000 replies, by model
- 03Reply speed: why reasoning settings matter for chat
- 04Tool use and accuracy: what published evals tell you
- 05Languages and tone for Singapore customers
- 06How to run your own 30-minute model test
- 07Do it yourself or get help?
- 08Frequently asked questions
Short answer
For most FAQ and enquiry chatbots, start with a small model such as GPT-6 Luna or Claude Haiku 5.5 at a low reasoning setting: about US$0.30 per 1,000 replies and fast. Move to a mid-range model like Claude Sonnet 5.5 or GPT-6.1 Sol only for complex, multi-step support.
Small, mid-range or frontier: what a support chatbot needs
AI vendors sell each model family in sizes. Small models are fast and cheap, mid-range models handle more complex reasoning, and frontier models top the benchmarks at a much higher price. A typical small-business chatbot answers questions from a known set of facts: opening hours, prices, delivery areas, booking rules, return policy. That is a reading-and-summarising job, which small models now do well when they are given the right documents.
Small model
Default for FAQ botsAbout US$0.30 per 1,000 replies
- GPT-6 Luna, Claude Haiku 5.5, Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
- Fast replies at low reasoning settings
- Good at answering from supplied FAQ text
- Weaker on long, multi-step troubleshooting
Best for: Enquiries, bookings, opening hours, prices and policy questions.
Mid-range model
For complex supportAbout US$6 per 1,000 replies
- Claude Sonnet 5.5, GPT-6.1 Sol, Gemini 3.8 Flash
- Better at multi-step problems and tricky wording
- More reliable when calling several tools in sequence
- Still fast at low or medium settings
Best for: Technical support, order changes and account questions.
Frontier model
Rarely neededUS$12 to US$30 per 1,000 replies
- Claude Opus 5.5 and GPT-6 Astra
- Top benchmark scores
- Higher cost and often slower
- Best kept for staff-facing analysis, not public chat
Best for: Internal research and hard reasoning, not FAQ chat.
Price per 1,000 replies, by model
Prices below come from each vendor's API price list: OpenAI, Anthropic and Google. The per-reply figures assume a round illustration of 2,000 input tokens (instructions, FAQ extract and chat history) and 200 output tokens per reply, with no caching. Our guide to LLM tokens and cost per customer reply works through the maths in detail.
| Model | Input / output per 1M tokens | Per 1,000 replies |
|---|---|---|
| GPT-6 Luna (OpenAI) | US$0.10 / US$0.50 | US$0.30 |
| Claude Haiku 5.5 (Anthropic) | US$0.10 / US$0.50 | US$0.30 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (Google) | US$0.30 / US$2.50 | US$1.10 |
| Gemini 3.8 Flash (Google) | US$0.75 / US$3.75 to 31 Dec 2026 | US$2.25 |
| Claude Sonnet 5.5 or GPT-6.1 Sol | US$2 / US$10 | US$6.00 |
| Claude Opus 5.5 | US$4 / US$20 | US$12.00 |
| GPT-6 Astra | US$10 / US$50 | US$30.00 |
Even the mid-range option costs about US$6 for 1,000 replies. For most small businesses, model choice is a quality and speed decision, not a budget one. Our API price comparison covers more models.
Tool use and accuracy: what published evals tell you
A support bot often needs to call tools: check an order, look up a booking slot, hand over to a human. Artificial Analysis runs the tau-squared bench telecom test, a simulated technical support conversation where agent and customer both take actions. On its tau-squared bench leaderboard, the top scores have reached about 99%, and the test is listed among its legacy evaluations. In other words, simple tool calling is largely solved; differences show up in harder, longer conversations.
For FAQ accuracy, the biggest factor is not the model but what you give it. A small model reading your actual price list will beat a frontier model guessing from general knowledge. Ground the bot in your own content, tell it to say "I don't know" and hand over when the answer is not there, and keep the knowledge base up to date.
Languages and tone for Singapore customers
Singapore customers may write in English, Singlish, Chinese, Malay or Tamil, sometimes mixing them in one message. Published leaderboards do not test this mix well, so it is worth checking yourself. Larger models generally handle code-switching and less common languages more reliably, which can justify a mid-range model if many enquiries are not in English.
How to run your own 30-minute model test
Benchmarks narrow the field; your own questions decide. This test needs only API access or a provider playground.
Collect 20 real customer questions
Take them from WhatsApp, email or your contact form, including a few awkward ones, a complaint and two in other languages.
Write one system prompt with your FAQ
Include prices, hours, policies and the rule to hand over when unsure. Use the same prompt for every model.
Run two or three models at low settings
For example GPT-6 Luna, Claude Haiku 5.5 and Claude Sonnet 5.5. Note how long each takes to start answering.
Score each answer
Correct, partly correct or wrong, plus whether it made anything up. Count hand-overs that should and should not have happened.
Pick the cheapest model that passes
If two models tie, choose the faster one. Re-run the test when you change the FAQ or when vendors release new versions.
Do it yourself or get help?
Off-the-shelf chatbot platforms let you choose a model from a drop-down. The work that makes a bot useful is the knowledge base, the guard-rails and the hand-over to a person. Our guide to AI chatbots for websites compares platforms and costs.
Our AI Website Assistant (S$790) sets up a chatbot trained on your website, FAQ and documents, with lead capture, hand-over to WhatsApp or email, English plus one more language and guard-rails so it only answers about your business. AI usage fees are billed to you directly.
Frequently asked questions
For most small-business FAQ and enquiry bots, a small model such as GPT-6 Luna or Claude Haiku 5.5 at a low reasoning setting is the best balance of cost and speed as of October 2026. Choose a mid-range model like Claude Sonnet 5.5 or GPT-6.1 Sol for complex troubleshooting or many non-English messages.
With a small model at about 2,000 input and 200 output tokens per reply, the AI cost is around US$0.0003 per reply, or US$0.30 per 1,000 replies, at October 2026 prices. Mid-range models cost about US$6 per 1,000 replies. Platform subscriptions and set-up are usually a bigger cost than the model itself.
Often because the model is set to a high reasoning level, which makes it think before answering. Artificial Analysis data shows the same model can take under a second or close to a minute to start replying depending on the setting. Lower the reasoning setting, shorten the prompt and test again.
Rarely. Frontier models top the benchmarks but cost 40 to 100 times more than small models and are often slower. For answering customers from your own FAQ and policies, a well-grounded small or mid-range model is usually accurate enough. Keep frontier models for internal analysis and hard reasoning tasks.
Yes, current models from OpenAI, Anthropic and Google handle Chinese and Malay, and larger models are generally more reliable with mixed-language messages. Benchmarks do not test Singapore's language mix well, so include real messages in Chinese, Malay and Singlish when you test models before going live.